Pharmacists & Retail Drug Store Employees Union, Local 330 v. Lake Hills Drug Co.
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
BEEKS, District Judge.
Initially the Court must decide whether it has jurisdiction of this action under Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 185 (a), in view of the fact that the plaintiff union, a majority of whose members are non-supervisory employees, represents and bargains for some persons who are “supervisors” as defined in the Act.
Defendants contend that because the plaintiff union includes “supervisors” within its membership, it is not a “labor organization representing employees” within the meaning of Section 301. Plaintiff, on the other…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- National Labor Relations Board v. Edward G. Budd Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
- A. H. Bull Steamship Co. v. National Marine Engineers' Beneficial Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Schroeder v. Meridian Improvement ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Florin Dente v. International Organization of Masters, Mates and Pilots, Local 90, Anunincorporated Labor OrganizationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Cruise v. Castleton, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Post v. Belmont Country Club, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
- Cappalli v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2012
- Edward Majewski, Executive of the Estate of Albert Z. Elkes v. B'nai B'rith InternationalCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.