Randolph Marketing Co. v. Stevenson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This action is in claim and delivery and is for the recovery of certain packing-house equipment installed by the predecessor in interest of the plaintiff in the packing-house of defendant, situated at Woodlake, Tulare County, designated and known as the “Rose Street Packing House. ’ ’
The various articles constituting the equipment referred to, according to the complaint and the findings, were: One double-stand grader, together with the partition boards, bins, sprocket wheels, and other attachments; one thirty-inch Miller elevator, five-foot delivery tables; one two-way stem and brushes and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carlin v. RitterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
- Pomeroy v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Conde v. SweeneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Marks v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- St. Goddard v. BurnhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
3Cited by4 opinions
- Klocke v. TroskeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
- Societa Italiana Di Mutua Beneficenza v. BurrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. Columbia Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025
- Pro-Troll v. Timothy Cronk, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026