Legal Opinion

Randolph Marketing Co. v. Stevenson

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 1923No. Civ. No. 2657PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

This action is in claim and delivery and is for the recovery of certain packing-house equipment installed by the predecessor in interest of the plaintiff in the packing-house of defendant, situated at Woodlake, Tulare County, designated and known as the “Rose Street Packing House. ’ ’

The various articles constituting the equipment referred to, according to the complaint and the findings, were: One double-stand grader, together with the partition boards, bins, sprocket wheels, and other attachments; one thirty-inch Miller elevator, five-foot delivery tables; one two-way stem and brushes and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carlin v. RitterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
  2. Pomeroy v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Conde v. SweeneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  4. Marks v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  5. St. Goddard v. BurnhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Klocke v. TroskeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Societa Italiana Di Mutua Beneficenza v. BurrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  3. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. Columbia Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025
  4. Pro-Troll v. Timothy Cronk, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API