Legal Opinion

Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. Columbia Casualty Company

District Court, S.D. California

Decided May 2, 2025No. 3:23-cv-02157Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT Case No.: 23-cv-02157-AJB-DDL LLOYD’S LONDON, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ 13 MOTIONS TO DISMISS v. 14 (Doc. Nos. 34; 35) 15 COLUMBIA CASUALTY COMPANY and ADMIRAL INSURANCE 16 COMPANY, 17 Defendants. 18 19 Before the Court are two motions seeking to dismiss plaintiff Certain Underwriters 20 at Lloyd’s, London’s (“Underwriters”) first amended complaint filed by Admiral Insurance 21 Company (“Admiral”) (see Doc. No. 34) and Columbia Casualty Company (“Columbia”) 22 (see Doc. No.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Shroyer v. New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Conservation Force v. SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API