Legal Opinion

Pro-Troll v. Timothy Cronk, et al.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 20, 2026No. 3:25-cv-06039Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 7 8 PRO-TROLL, Case No. 25-cv-06039-PHK 9 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 10 v. FOR ALTERNATIVE SERVICE OF DEFENDANTS BY PUBLICATION 11 TIMOTHY CRONK, et al., Re: Dkt. 12 12 Defendants. 13 14 This matter is before the Court on an ex parte motion filed by Plaintiff Pro-Troll 15 (“Plaintiff”), requesting authorization to serve Defendants Timothy Cronk (“Mr. Cronk”) and Axis 16 Wholesale LLC (“Axis”) by publication. [Dkt. 12]. The Court deems the matter suitable for 17…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Donel, Inc. v. BadalianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Kott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Calvert v. Al Binali, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. Vorburg v. VorburgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API