Legal Opinion

In re the Personal Restraint of Stanphill

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1998No. 64729-1PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This case examines whether the Indeterminate Sentence Review Board (Board)1 may use 1993 sentencing ranges of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981 (SRA) when setting the minimum sentence of a 1975 offender without violating ex post facto and equal protection constitutional guarantees. We reverse the Court of Appeals *168and hold the Board may use current SRA ranges when setting the minimum sentence of pre-SRA offenders.

FACTS

On March 29, 1975, Parker Charles Stanphill (Stanphill) sexually assaulted L.K. in Franklin County, Washington. On April 14, 1975, Stanphill raped another woman in Pima County,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Baxstrom v. HeroldSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Davis v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Tunstall v. BergesonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. AhoWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. In re the Personal Restraint GentryWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 2004

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API