Legal Opinion

Target Corp. v. All Jersey Janitorial Service, Inc.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided January 7, 2013No. Civil No. 11-2429 (JNE/LIB)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*911ORDER

JOAN N. ERICKSEN, District Judge.

Plaintiff Target Corp. brought an action against defendant Ml Jersey Janitorial Service, Inc., claiming that Ml Jersey failed to indemnify Target under a contractual indemnification provision for expenses arising out of the performance of Ml Jersey’s services. The case is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies both motions.

I. BACKGROUND

In 2005, Target entered into the Target Corporation Building Services Service Agreement (the Agreement) with Ml Jersey where Ml Jersey assented…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Eclipse Architectural Group, Inc. v. LamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  3. Emerson v. Board of Independent School District 199Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  4. D.W. Hutt Consultants, Inc. v. Construction Maintenance Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kelley v. KaniosDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019
  2. Kelley v. KaniosDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API