Legal Opinion
Emerson v. Board of Independent School District 199
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 1, 2012No. A09-1134PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIETZEN, Justice.
Appellant Steven Emerson was employed by respondent Independent School District No. 199 (school district) in Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota, for 3 school years as the activities director, and then for 1 school year as interim middle school principal. Subsequently, the school district terminated Emerson's employment. Emerson filed a grievance on the ground that he was a continuing-contract employee and entitled to continuing-contract rights under Minn.Stat, § 122A.40 (2010). The school district denied the grievance and his subsequent grievance appeals. Emerson filed a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Premier Bank v. BECKER DEVELOPMENT, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Mattson v. FlynnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- A.A.A. v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- In the Matter of the Expulsion of A.D. From United South Central Public Schools No. 2134Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Martin v. DicklichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- White v. City of Elk RiverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- In re RestorffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.