Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Washington Water Power Co. v. Superior Court

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1952No. 32212PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

What effect, if any, does a written stipulation, that an action cannot be noted for trial by either counsel before an agreed date, have upon the application of Rule 3, Rules of Pleading, Practice and Procedure, 34A Wn. (2d) 69, which reads:

“Any civil action shall be dismissed, without prejudice, for want of prosecution whenever the plaintiff or cross-complainant shall neglect to note the action for trial or *486hearing within one year after any issue of law or fact has been joined, unless the failure to bring the same on for trial or hearing was caused by the party who makes the motion to…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Lyle v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. State Ex Rel. Goodnow v. O'PhelanWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. State Ex Rel. Philips v. HallWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. State Ex Rel. Dawson v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. State Ex Rel. Pacific Fruit & Produce Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1945

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. City of Des Moines v. HemenwayWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Public Utility District No. 1 v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Finley v. FinleyWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Snohomish County v. Thorp MeatsWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Bellevue School District No. 405 v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 1967

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API