Legal Opinion

Murray v. Meyer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 24, 1986No. 17145; CA A35557PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a final judgment in an action on a contract. We limit our discussion to his assignment of error with respect to the trial court’s disallowance, on procedural grounds, of his cost bill. On that issue we reverse; we affirm in all other respects.

The trial court disallowed the cost bill, because plaintiff had “failed to prove that the cost bill was served upon defendants in accordance with Oregon law.” On appeal, plaintiff contends that he complied with the relevant rules of procedure or that, if he did not, the defect in the manner of service did not affect their…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Frederickson v. DitmoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. State Ex Rel. Roberts v. Bomareto Ent., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. In re the Marriage of GintherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. CIT GROUP/EQUIPMENT FINANCING, INC. v. KendallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. State Department of Human Resources v. StrasserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API