Buckley v. Orem
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SWANSTROM, Judge.
In this appeal we are asked to determine how much an insurance company must pay under its liability policy where its insured caused bodily injuries to both a husband and his wife, but the “lump sum” verdict in favor of the couple did not specify the amount of damages awarded for each spouse and the husband’s damages alone could have exceeded the $100,000 “per person” limit of the policy. The district court held that an insurance company must intervene in the action against its insured to timely seek apportionment of damages for each spouse if the company desires…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Runcorn v. Shearer Lumber Products, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
- Anthony D. Duke v. Joel Hoch, Home Indemnity Company, Garnishee-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Perkoski v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Packard v. Joint School District No. 171Idaho Court of Appeals · 1983
- Security Insurance Company of Hartford v. HouserSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Remodeling Dimensions, Inc. v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Medcalf v. State, Dept. of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- City of Idaho Falls v. Home Indemnity Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1995
- McCoy v. Colonial Baking Co. Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.