Legal Opinion

Tedesco v. Connors

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided April 27, 2005No. 2003-469-AppealPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIAMS, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff, Dawn Tedesco (plaintiff), and her husband Frank Tedesco, appeal from a judgment as a matter of law in favor of the defendant, the Rhode Island Department of Transportation (DOT or defendant), dismissing her negligence cause of action. The trial justice ruled: (1) the public duty doctrine barred the plaintiffs suit; and (2) the egregious conduct exception was inapplicable. This case came before the Supreme Court for oral argument on September 29, 2004, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Haley v. Town of LincolnSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
  3. Filippi v. FilippiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
  4. Mills v. State Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
  5. Catone v. MedberrySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bliss Mine Road Condominium Ass'n v. Nationwide Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
  2. Bucki v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
  3. Lacey v. ReitsmaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
  4. Gianquitti v. Atwood Medical Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  5. Calise v. CurtinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API