Legal Opinion

Teets v. Crescent Portland Cement Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 28, 1936No. Appeal, 105PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

Plaintiff has a verdict for $1,250, with judgment thereon, as damages for injuries suffered while assisting in moving a heavy piece of machinery in defendant’s cement plant. In this appeal by the defendant a new trial is not sought, but it is earnestly contended that its point for binding instructions should have been affirmed by the trial judge, Patterson, J., or its subsequent motion for judgment n. o. v. granted by the court in banc.

By its assignments of error and statement of questions involved, appellant indicates three grounds to be considered, in disposing of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Callihan v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Shafer v. Lacock, Hawthorn & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  3. Zahniser v. Pennsylvania Torpedo Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  4. Blake v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Wright v. StraessleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stark v. Lehigh Foundries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Dillon v. William S. Scull Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Debenjak v. Parkway Oil Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Smith v. Esslinger's, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Sofis v. Charles Zubik Sons, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API