Legal Opinion
Valley Bank of Nevada, a Nevada Banking Corporation v. Plus System, Inc., a Delaware Membership Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 11, 1990No. 89-16287PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Plus System, Inc. (“Plus”) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Valley Bank of Nevada (“Valley”) on Plus’s claim that a Nevada statute violates the commerce clause of the United States Constitution. 1 Under the statute, ATM networks may not prohibit a Nevada bank from charging transaction fees to an automated teller machine (ATM) cardholder who withdraws funds from the Nevada bank’s ATM but whose account is with another bank. We affirm.
FACTS
Valley is a Nevada bank with branches throughout the state. Plus is a shared automated teller machine (ATM)…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Exxon Corp. v. Governor of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. New York State Liquor AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Greenwood Trust Company v. Commonwealth of MassachusettsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Association Des Eleveurs De Canards Et D'Oies Du Quebec v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- S.D. Myers, Inc. v. City and County of San Francisco and San Francisco Human Rights CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Nunez v. City Of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Nunez v. City of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.