Deas v. Knapp
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NEWMAN, J.
Sections 10450.6 and 10470 et seq. of the Business and Professions Code create a fund, derived from real estate license fees, for payment of claims on unsatisfied judgments against licensees for fraud or conversion of trust funds in connection with licensed activities.1 Payment automatically suspends the judgment debtor’s license until he or she reimburses the fund, with interest. (§ 10475.)
Plaintiff judgment creditors, defendant Knapp, who is a real estate broker, and the Real Estate Commissioner all appeal from an order for payment. Defendant’s appeal raises the main issue…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
- City of Los Angeles v. City of San FernandoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Vella v. HudginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Nordahl v. Department of Real EstateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Squaw Valley Ski Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Vedanta Society of Southern California v. California Quartet Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- California Real Estate Loans, Inc. v. WallaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Mueller v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Augustyn v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.