Legal Opinion
Frymire v. Ampex Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 19, 1995No. Nos. 94-1059, 94-1090PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHT, Circuit Judge.
I. Introduction
Frymire and eighty-four other employees (“Plaintiffs”) of Ampex Corporation (“Am-pex”) brought this action against Ampex, alleging violations of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (“WARN”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2101-2109. The WARN Act requires large employers who are either closing a plant or instituting mass layoffs to provide sixty-days advance notice to those employees who will be laid off or who will have their hours substantially reduced. After a bench trial, the district court1 determined that Ampex had violated the notice requirements of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. BonjornoSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. KeenanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Allen v. Sybase, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Towerridge, Inc., Sued as United States of America for the Benefit of Towerridge, Inc., and v. T.A.O., Inc., and Mid-Continent Casualty Co., AndCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- West Hills Farms, LLC v. ClassicStar Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Breedlove v. Earthgrains Baking Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Harbert v. Healthcare Services Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.