Legal Opinion

Pollard v. Geo Group, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 7, 2010No. 07-16112PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*585Opinion by Judge PAEZ; Partial Concurrence and partial Dissent by Judge RESTANI.

PAEZ, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff-Appellant Richard Lee Pollard, a federal inmate, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his Eighth Amendment claims against employees of a private corporation operating a federal prison under contract with the Bureau of Prisons.1 This appeal presents the question of whether the implied damages action first recognized in Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), allows a federal prisoner to recover for…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Minneci v. PollardSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Nuñag-Tanedo v. East Baton Rouge Parish School BoardDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011
  3. Delia v. City of RialtoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Erickson v. Boston Scientific Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
  5. In Re DirecTV Early Cancellation LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API