Legal Opinion

Ballard v. Heppe

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 1991No. 2567 Philadelphia 1990PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellants, who are owners of property in the Sunny-brook subdivision in Chestnuthill Township and members of an unincorporated association, appeal the August 10, 1990 order of the Monroe County Court of Common Pleas which denied their request for an injunction. They seek to prevent appellees, David and Vickie Heppe and Marcella Souls, from subdividing their property and building homes on the newly-created lots. Appellee property owners obtained approval for their subdivisions from the Chestnuthill Township Board of Supervisors on the recommendation of the Township Planning Commission.…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. CLANCY v. RECKERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Philadelphia Fresh Food Terminal Corp. v. M. Levin & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Grasso v. ThimonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Covey v. GrossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Young v. CeroneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re VistaCare Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  2. Berg v. Georgetown Builders, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Doylestown Township v. TeelingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Cobbs v. Allied Chemical Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Perrige v. HorningSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API