Legal Opinion
Berg v. Georgetown Builders, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 17, 2003PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
¶ 1 Appellants, Moira A. and Gerald S. Berg, were the unsuccessful plaintiffs in an equity action filed against appellees, and appellant Barry S. Yaches was their attorney. 1 They bring this appeal 2 from an order of the trial court assessing counsel fees against them under 42 Pa.C.S. § 2503. We are constrained to reverse the order of the trial court.
¶ 2 In 1992, appellee, Georgetown Builders (hereinafter Georgetown), submitted to Buckingham Township (hereinafter Township) a preliminary subdivision plan for development of the Ash Mill subdivision, proposing to carve 13 lots out of the…
3Cases cited22 opinions
- McNair's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Thunberg v. StrauseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Slappo v. J's Development Associates, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Brenckle v. ArblasterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- In Re Estate of RoosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by22 opinions
- In Re VistaCare Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Neal v. Bavarian Motors, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Ace American Insurance v. Underwriters at Lloyds & CompaniesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Diener Brick Co. v. Mastro Masonry ContractorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- In re Barnes FoundationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.