Legal Opinion

Hegarty v. Berger

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 1931No. Appeals, 177 and 178PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Walling,

On the evening of September 3, 1926, as Thomas J. Eimmer was driving his Ford car west in Haverford Street, Philadelphia, it came in contact with the Buick car of the defendant, Edna F. Berger, headed north in Thirty-eighth Street. It is a right-angle intersection and as a result of the impact the course of the Eimmer car was deflected northerly against the north curb of Haverford Street, a short distance west of the west curb of Thirty-eighth Street, where it upset upon the sidewalk, striking and injuring Mary Hegarty, the wife plaintiff, and her four-year-old…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Alperdt Et Ux. v. PaigeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Weber v. GreenebaumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Hughes v. Pittsburgh Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Thomas v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  5. Mountain v. American Window Glass Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Burbage v. Boiler Engineering & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. Geelen v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Hostetler v. KniseleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Muehlhof v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. O'Farrell v. MawsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API