Legal Opinion

Lomel Realty Corporation v. Chopin

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 1, 1933No. 32043PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAND, Justice.

The Lomel Realty Corporation has instituted the present suit to compel defendant to perform specifically an offer and agreement to purchase from plaintiff 19.4 acres in the town of Claiborne, St. Tammany parish, less approximately 4.7 acres, and to recover from defendant a stipulated attorney’s fees of 25 per cent, and a commission of 4 per cent, on the amount offered for the property and all costs incurred, in the event of defendant’s failure to comply with his contract.

Defendant admits in his answer tender of title by plaintiff and his refusal to accept same, and alleges as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Murphy v. HusseySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  2. Kinberger v. DrouetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  3. Jaenke v. TaylorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  4. Gamet's Estate v. LindnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  5. Muller v. MazeratSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fox v. DollSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
  2. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
  3. Toler v. Pacific Intern. Petroleum, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Richardson v. Charles Kirsch & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Guidry v. SiglerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API