Legal Opinion

Fox v. Doll

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 28, 1952No. 40023PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOISE, Justice.

Writs were granted in this case to review a judgment of the appellate court, which denied plaintiffs’ claim for double the amount of a deposit made by them to bind an agreement to purchase and permitted the defendant vendors to retain the amount of said deposit, $200,'thereby reversing a judgment of the district court in favor of plaintiffs.

The facts of the case, briefly, are:

Applicants signed on April 26, 1948 an agreement to purchase certain property from respondent vendors for the price of $2,000; the contract, which was on a printed form used by vendors in their real estate…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Murphy v. HusseySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  2. Kinberger v. DrouetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  3. Jaenke v. TaylorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  4. Wilbor v. M'GillicuddySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1832
  5. Louisiana Farms Co. v. Yazoo M.V.R. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Andrew Dev. Corp. v. West Esplanade Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  2. Southern Construction Co. v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1967
  3. Dufrene v. TracySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  4. Louisiana Industrial Coatings, Inc. v. Boh Bros. Construction Co. (In Re Louisiana Industrial Coatings, Inc.)District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1985
  5. Triton Realty Co. v. FriemanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API