Legal Opinion

In Re Toplitt

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 26, 1973PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondents were .named as defendants in a multi-count, multi-party indictment charging conspiracy to obtain moneys by false pretenses from various liability insurance companies by presenting false claims for personal injuries in automobile accidents and prosecuting suits and obtaining payments thereon. Pursuant to a plea bargain, Toplitt pleaded guilty to one count of the indictment and Marcus did likewise as to two counts. It is freely admitted they both had participated in numerous other fraudulent claims beyond those as to which the pleas were entered. Indeed, Toplitt, whose nefarious…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re YormarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  2. In Re PerrellaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  3. In Re PerwinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  4. In Re ZwillmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matter of LitwinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  2. Matter of SurgentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  3. In Re IvlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  4. Matter of LitwinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API