Legal Opinion

Matter of Litwin

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 20, 1986Published

1Opinion of the Court

104 N.J. 362 (1986)

517 A.2d 378

IN THE MATTER OF DAVID S. LITWIN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued September 9, 1986.

Decided November 20, 1986.

Robyn M. Hill, Deputy Ethics Counsel, argued the cause on behalf of Office of Attorney Ethics.

Burton L. Eichler argued the cause for respondent (Brach, Eichler, Rosenberg, Silver, Bernstein, Hammer & Gladstone, attorneys; Burton L. Eichler and Todd C. Brower, on the brief).

2Per curiam

Respondent entered a plea of guilty to a charge of aggravated arson, N.J.S.A. 2C:17-1(a)(2), a second-degree crime. This disciplinary proceeding arose from a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re HughesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. Matter of KushnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  3. Matter of TempletonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  4. In Re InfinitoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  5. In Re RosenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API