Legal Opinion
In Re Yormark
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided February 7, 1972PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam.
The respondent was convicted of criminal offenses in connection with a conspiracy to defraud an insurance carrier. The convictions were affirmed by the Appellate Division, 117 N. J. Super. 313 (1971), and we have denied certification. 60 N. J. 138 (1972).
The misconduct requires an order of disbarment, and it is so ordered.
We are advised that respondent intends to seek further review of the convictions in other tribunals. Should he prevail in those efforts, he may apply to us for reconsideration of this order.
For disbarment—Chief Justice Weinteaub and Justices Jacobs, Francis,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Travel Agts. Malpractice v. Regal Cul. Soc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tormo v. YormarkDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1975
- Passanante v. YormarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- United States v. FriedlandDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1980
- Matter of SurgentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- Matter of ZauberSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.