United States v. Gutzler
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal by the United States
from a judgment of the district court awarding a refund of excess profits tax Paid by the Trumble Refining Company, a dissolved corporation for the tax year 1917 The case was tned by the district court, the jury having been waived, and the appeal allowed before the new Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, were adopted. The *189facts are presented to us in a bill of exceptions.
The district court found, “That the correct tax liability of the Trumble Refining Company for the year 1917 is the sum of $3,389.19…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Botany Worsted Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. Felt & Tarrant Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Perkins v. ElgSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Helvering v. Mountain Producers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Headline Publications, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1957
- Somers Coal Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1942
- Heinz Haber v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Heinz Haber v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987