Legal Opinion

Heinz Haber v. The United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided October 21, 1987No. 87-1102Published

1Opinion of the Court

831 F.2d 1051

60 A.F.T.R.2d 87-5778, 87-2 USTC P 9574

Heinz HABER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 87-1102.

United States Court of Appeals,

Federal Circuit.

Oct. 21, 1987.

Edward Ord, Ord & Norman, of San Francisco, Cal., argued for plaintiff-appellant.

B. Paul Klein, Dept. of Justice, of Washington, D.C., argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Roger M. Olsen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Michael L. Paup and Gilbert S. Rothenberg.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, and BISSELL, Circuit Judges.

PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

1

Mr. Heinz Haber (taxpayer) appeals an…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. MichelSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Jewelers Vigilance Committee, Inc. v. Ullenberg Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  3. Hart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
  4. Ned Miller and Frances Miller v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  5. Featheringill v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API