Legal Opinion · Dissent

Heinz Haber v. The United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided October 21, 1987No. 87-1102Published

1DissentBissell, Circuit Judge

I am compelled to dissent. Although I sympathize with the taxpayer, the law in this case is clearly on the side of the Internal Revenue Service. I would affirm the decision of the Claims Court.

The facts are that Haber filed for an income tax refund for the 1970 and 1971 tax years. The IRS disallowed the claims. Haber’s accountant negotiated with the IRS, and requested further administrative consideration of the refund claims. The two-year statute of limitations expired. The IRS issued a second notice of disallowance. Within two years of the second notice, Haber filed suit in the United States…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. MichelSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Ned Miller and Frances Miller v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  3. B. Altman & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  4. Southeast Bank of Orlando v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  5. Beardsley v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API