Howard v. Zimmer, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CERTIFICATION OF QUESTION OF STATE LAW
CARLOS F. LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
This appeal presents a novel issue of Oklahoma law: Does Oklahoma recognize a claim for negligence per se founded on an alleged violation of a federal regulation promulgated under the Medical Device Amendments (“MDA”) to the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”)? Although this case has involved numerous issues in several federal courts, this state-law question is the only one remaining. Because Oklahoma law is not settled on this point, we respectfully certify the question to the Oklahoma Supreme Court.
I
Dr. Brian Howard was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. SmallsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Chambers v. St. Mary's SchoolOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Rohrbaugh v. Celotex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Spurlock v. TownesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Howard v. Zimmer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013