Legal Opinion

Howard v. Zimmer, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 3, 2012No. 11-5109PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERTIFICATION OF QUESTION OF STATE LAW

CARLOS F. LUCERO, Circuit Judge.

This appeal presents a novel issue of Oklahoma law: Does Oklahoma recognize a claim for negligence per se founded on an alleged violation of a federal regulation promulgated under the Medical Device Amendments (“MDA”) to the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”)? Although this case has involved numerous issues in several federal courts, this state-law question is the only one remaining. Because Oklahoma law is not settled on this point, we respectfully certify the question to the Oklahoma Supreme Court.

I

Dr. Brian Howard was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. United States v. SmallsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  4. Chambers v. St. Mary's SchoolOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Rohrbaugh v. Celotex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Spurlock v. TownesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  2. Howard v. Zimmer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API