United States v. Smalls
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Where a declarant is unavailable to testify at trial, Fed.R.Evid. 804(b)(3) provides for the admissibility of “[a] statement which ... at the time of its making ... so far tended to subject the declarant to ... criminal liability ... that a reasonable person in the declarant’s position would not have made the statement unless believing it to be true.” The issue in this interlocutory appeal, presented to us pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3731, is whether the district court abused its discretion in excluding as inadmissible hearsay, and thus as outside the scope of Rule…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by230 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Spring Creek Exploration & Prod. Co. v. Hess Bakken Inv., II, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Guttman v. KhalsaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- State v. TurnidgeOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- United States v. Figueroa-CartagenaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
225 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.