Legal Opinion

Rohrbaugh v. Celotex Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 3, 1995No. 93-5277PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL J. KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs-Appellants Rohrbaugh, Clay, and Ambler appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Owens-Corning Fiberglas (“OCF”). Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.

Background

Plaintiffs filed a negligence and products liability action to recover for the alleged wrongful death of their mother, Dorothy Mae Palmer. Plaintiffs allege that Mrs. Palmer was exposed to asbestos dust when she washed the work clothes worn by her husband, this dust came from products manufactured by OCF, and the exposure…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. United States v. Westlands Water DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2001
  2. Peterson v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  3. MacKenzie v. City & County of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  4. Wrenn Ex Rel. Wrenn v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  5. Mitchell v. MaynardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API