In re the Estate of Butler
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRAS, Justice.
This case presents the question of whether the respondents presented sufficient evidence to overcome the statutory presumption in favor of survivorship rights for joint accounts under the Minnesota Multiparty Accounts Act. See Minn.Stat. §§ 524.6-201 to-214 (2010). Because Minn.Stat. § 524.6-204(a) requires that the evidence offered to overcome the statutory presumption must “specifically refer[ ]” to the joint accounts at issue, we conclude that the respondents failed to present sufficient evidence to satisfy their burden of proof. We therefore reverse the district…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Bahr v. Boise Cascade Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Republic National Life Insurance Co. v. Lorraine Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Larson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Gieseke v. IDCA, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- State v. PakhnyukSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
- Braylock v. JessonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Christie v. EstateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.