Bingham v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GREEN, Commissioner.
In a trial before the court, appellant was convicted of burglary. This appeal was by per curiam opinion dated April 3, 1974, abated because of the erroneous consideration by the trial court for punishment purposes of improperly admitted evidence, and the cause was remanded to the trial court for re-assessment of punishment by a different judge, and for resentencing. A supplemental record has now been filed reflecting that in compliance with the mandate of this Court the trial court, with a different judge presiding, conducted a punishment hearing, heard evidence…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Chaffin v. StynchcombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Warren v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Duckett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Houston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Wiltz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Wiltz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
- Garrett v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.