Legal Opinion
Wiltz v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided May 12, 1993No. 688-92PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
MEYERS, Judge.
A jury convicted appellant of attempted aggravated sexual assault and the trial court assessed punishment at confinement for ten years, probated. The conviction was reversed by the Court of Appeals because of Batson1 error. Wiltz v. State, 749 S.W.2d 519 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th] 1988, no pet.). Upon retrial a jury again convicted appellant of attempted aggravated sexual assault and *464appellant again chose to have the trial court assess punishment. A different judge presided at the retrial and assessed punishment at confinement…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
- Keith Ladale Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Washington v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2004
- Tillman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Washington, Dana Wayne v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.