Warren v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DALLY, Commissioner.
The appellant was convicted for receiving and concealing property that he knew was stolen, and he was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment. His appeal presents questions of double jeopardy, collateral es-toppel, sufficiency of the evidence, and corroboration of accomplice witness testi mony, as well as four grounds concerning evidentiary questions.
Accomplice witnesses Frederick Quiller and Benny Ford were the admitted burglars of a Mobile service station from which they took twenty-five tires and three cans of oil. They were seen in the act during the early morning…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- Carrillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Gamez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- McManus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Passmore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- May v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.