Legal Opinion

Wiltz v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided January 30, 1992No. 01-90-00517-CRPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*373OPINION

HUGHES, Justice.

Appeal is taken from a conviction for attempted aggravated sexual assault. Appellant pled not guilty. After hearing the evidence and argument, the jury found appellant guilty as charged in the indictment. The trial court assessed punishment at five-years incarceration.

We reverse in part and remand the case to the trial court to reassess punishment.

This is the second appeal of this cause. Appellant’s first conviction was reversed and remanded due to a Batson1 violation. Wiltz v. State, 749 S.W.2d 519 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1988, no pet.).

In his first three points…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Alejandro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Ex Parte AdamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Lechuga v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  2. Keith Ladale Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  3. Wiltz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. CC Justin Rivas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010
  5. CC Justin Rivas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API