Prince Corp. v. Vandenberg
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtStark, J.
¶ 1. James Vandenberg, Sharon Kempen, Sandra Schmit, and Mark Vandenberg owned real property as tenants in common. They entered into a land contract to sell the property to Van De Hey Real Estate, LLC. Thereafter, Prince Corporation, which had previously obtained and docketed a money judgment against James Vandenberg, sought to garnish a portion of the final payment due under the land contract.1 The circuit court initially granted Prince's request; however, it reconsidered its decision after Kempen, Schmit, and Mark Vandenberg (the Intervenors) intervened in the garnishment action and filed a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Charolais Breeding Ranches, Ltd. v. FPC Securities Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
- Watts v. WattsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. Van CampWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. PlymesserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- Kirk v. Credit Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Prince Corporation v. James N. VandenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
- Prince Corporation v. James N. VandenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
- Prince Corporation v. James N. VandenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016