Legal Opinion

Prince Corp. v. Vandenberg

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided June 16, 2015No. Case No. 2014AP2097; Case No. 2014AP2295PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStark, J.

¶ 1. James Vandenberg, Sharon Kempen, Sandra Schmit, and Mark Vandenberg owned real property as tenants in common. They entered into a land contract to sell the property to Van De Hey Real Estate, LLC. Thereafter, Prince Corporation, which had previously obtained and docketed a money judgment against James Vandenberg, sought to garnish a portion of the final payment due under the land contract.1 The circuit court initially granted Prince's request; however, it reconsidered its decision after Kempen, Schmit, and Mark Vandenberg (the Intervenors) intervened in the garnishment action and filed a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Charolais Breeding Ranches, Ltd. v. FPC Securities Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
  2. Watts v. WattsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. Van CampWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. PlymesserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Kirk v. Credit Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Prince Corporation v. James N. VandenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Prince Corporation v. James N. VandenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Prince Corporation v. James N. VandenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API