Srolowitz v. Roseman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 116, Jan. T., 1919, by defendant, from decree of C. P. No. 1, Philadelphia Co., Sept. T., 1917, No. 1676, in Equity, granting an injunction and ordering an accounting in case of Wolf Srolowitz v. Morris Roseman. Bill in equity for an injunction and for an accounting. Patterson, J., filed the following opinion: By agreement of the parties this case came on to be heard on bill, answer and proofs.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 116, Jan. T., 1919, by defendant, from decree of C. P. No. 1, Philadelphia Co., Sept. T., 1917, No. 1676, in Equity, granting an injunction and ordering an accounting in case of Wolf Srolowitz v. Morris Roseman. Bill in equity for an injunction and for an accounting. Patterson, J., filed the following opinion: By agreement of the parties this case came on to be heard on bill, answer and proofs. The court after hearing makes the following FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. The plaintiff, Wolf Srolowitz, is now and has been for fifteen years engaged in the business of buying and selling veal,…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
We have’ not been persuaded that the material facts found by the learned chancellor below ought to be disturbed. They were followed by correct legal conclusions, and the decree is affirmed at appellant’s costs.
2Cited by11 opinions
- John G. Bryant Co. v. Sling Testing & Repair, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Matthews v. BarnesTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
- Camenisch v. AllenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Jennings v. Shepherd Laundries Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Parisian Live Dyers & Cleaners v. SpringfieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.