Legal Opinion

Camenisch v. Allen

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 1945No. Appeal, 165PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, P. J.,

This appeal is from the dismissal of a bill in equity filed by the plaintiffs, appellants herein, to restrain the first named defendant, Howard C. Allen, from violating a clause in an employment contract. This appeal is not being pressed against Caroline White, the second named defendant.

The contract, dated November 30,1943, was between Carrie C. Newman, trading as Philadelphia Auditing and Calculating Company, and Howard C. Allen, who was to be tbe manager of tbe company at a salary equal to 50% of the net profits. Paragraph 5, which gives rise to the main dispute…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harrison v. WelshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Hocking v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. Schwartz v. WhelanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. First N. Bk. of Bangor v. Bangor Tr. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. McCormick v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Widmer Engineering, Inc. v. DufallaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. All-Pak, Inc. v. JohnstonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Reynolds v. TiceWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Barnes v. McKellarSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Lane Enterprises, Inc. v. L.B. Foster Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API