Legal Opinion

Matthews v. Barnes

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1927PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

By the hill filed herein the complainants seek to enjoin the defendant from entering the employ of one of its competitors in the City of Nashville, in violation of his written agreement not to do so.

The Chancellor granted the relief prayed for, and upon appeal the Court of Appeals reversed the decree of the Chancellor and dismissed the hill.

The facts, as found hy the Court of Appeals, are as follows:

“On July 6, 1923, the appellees (complainants) entered into a written contract with the appellant (defendant), which is as follows:
“ 'Whereas, I have this day become employed by the •Rent-A-F'ord…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Turner v. AbbottTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Srolowitz v. RosemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  3. Baird v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Vantage Technology, LLC v. CrossCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  2. Allright Auto Parks, Inc. v. BerryTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Cole v. Goodwin & StoryNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  4. Hasty v. Rent-A-Driver, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Meissel v. FinleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1956

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API