Legal Opinion

Hadfield v. A.W. Chesterton Co.

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided September 15, 2009No. 20084382PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fremont-Smith, Thayer, J.

Plaintiff Kevin Hadfield (“Hadfield”) worked for defendant A.W. Chesterton (“Chesterton”) from 1985 to 2007, at which time he resigned and asked for payment for his unused accrued vacation time. Chesterton refused to pay Had-field for his earned vacation time, and Hadfield brought the following claims against Chesterton and several of its employees (collectively, “defendants”): (1) violation of the Massachusetts Wage Act, G.L.c. 149, §148 (“Wage Act”); and (2) breach of contract. Defendants now move the Court to dismiss Hadfield’s claims. For the following reasons,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Iannacchino v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  3. Ginther v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  4. Williams v. Episcopal DioceseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  5. Highway Equipment Company v. Caterpillar Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dow v. CasaleMassachusetts Superior Court · 2011
  2. Nekoroski v. MathaiMassachusetts Superior Court · 2012
  3. Hadfield v. ChestertonMassachusetts Superior Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API