Legal Opinion
Ginther v. Commissioner of Insurance
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided April 21, 1998PublishedCited by 128 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.
The plaintiffs,3 alleging that they were “persons aggrieved” under G. L. c. 175, § 206D (f) (1), brought an action in Superior Court seeking de novo review of the decision by the Commissioner of Insurance (commissioner) to approve the acquisition of Paul Revere Life Insurance Company and Paul Revere Variable Annuity Insurance Company (Paul Revere), both Massachusetts insurance companies, by Provident Companies, Inc. (Provident), a Delaware corporation. The defendants filed motions to dismiss.4 The motions were allowed based on the plaintiffs’ lack of standing. See Mass. R. Civ. P. 12 (b) (1),…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Nader v. CitronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Boston Edison Co. v. Boston Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Massachusetts Ass'n of Independent Insurance Agents & Brokers, Inc. v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Massachusetts Electric Co. v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Harvard Law School Coalition for Civil Rights v. President & Fellows of Harvard CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by128 opinions
- Sullivan v. Chief Justice for Administration & Management of the Trial CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Eigerman v. Putnam Investments, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- Melia v. Zenhire, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
- Bevilacqua v. RodriguezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
- Lopez v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.