Legal Opinion
Liquor Control Commission v. McGillis
Utah Supreme Court
Decided March 15, 1937No. 5792PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANSON, Justice.
The Liquor Control Commission of Utah filed a complaint against defendants in the lower court in which it was al leged that the defendants were conducting an establishment in Salt Lake City in violation of the provisions of the Liquor Control Act, being chapter 43, Laws of Utah 1935, alleging specifically that defendants were mixing, selling, and serving alcoholic beverages to the general public; that under the provisions of the Liquor Control Act the premises so used by defendants were a common nuisance; that defendants intend to persist in such violation of said act unless…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Howat v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Riggins v. District Court of Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1935
- Young v. CannonUtah Supreme Court · 1880
- Utah Power & Light Co. v. Richmond Irr. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1932
- Allen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hodous v. HodousNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
- People v. RyanIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. SimpsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
- Ex Parte ConnorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Iota v. Davco Management CompanyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.