Legal Opinion

Iota v. Davco Management Company

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided November 25, 2016No. 20130552-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROTH, Judge:

¶1 This ease returns to us after we vacated a contempt judgment and remanded-to the district court in Iota, LLC v. Davco Mgmt. Co. (Iota I), 2012 UT App 218, 284 P.3d 681. That decision was based on a procedural defect, and on remand Iota LLC and California Benefit Inc. (collectively, Iota) cured the defect. The district court entered a new contempt judgment, from which Davco Management Company LC and David Fisher 2 (collectively, Davco) now appeal. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶2 A full account of the background in this case is available in Iota I, 2012 UT App 218, ¶¶ 2-9, 284 P.3d…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Walker v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Patterson v. PattersonUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Dixie State Bank v. BrackenUtah Supreme Court · 1988

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Faucheaux v. Provo CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  2. South Jordan City v. SummerhaysCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
  3. Brindley v. Logan CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023
  4. Knight Adjustment v. FunaroCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
  5. Second Big Springs v. Granite PeakCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API