Iota v. Davco Management Company
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROTH, Judge:
¶1 This ease returns to us after we vacated a contempt judgment and remanded-to the district court in Iota, LLC v. Davco Mgmt. Co. (Iota I), 2012 UT App 218, 284 P.3d 681. That decision was based on a procedural defect, and on remand Iota LLC and California Benefit Inc. (collectively, Iota) cured the defect. The district court entered a new contempt judgment, from which Davco Management Company LC and David Fisher 2 (collectively, Davco) now appeal. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶2 A full account of the background in this case is available in Iota I, 2012 UT App 218, ¶¶ 2-9, 284 P.3d…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Walker v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Patterson v. PattersonUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- Dixie State Bank v. BrackenUtah Supreme Court · 1988
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Faucheaux v. Provo CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
- South Jordan City v. SummerhaysCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
- Brindley v. Logan CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023
- Knight Adjustment v. FunaroCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
- Second Big Springs v. Granite PeakCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023