Legal Opinion

O'CALLAGHAN v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1992No. S-4227PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

Mike O’Callaghan appeals the superior court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Director of Elections and Jack Coghill, arguing that Coghill was a “disqualified” candidate under AS 15.25.110 and that the Director of Elections unlawfully placed his name on the 1990 general election ballot. The single issue which we address is whether AS 15.25.110 prohibits a person’s name from appearing on the general election ballot when that person withdraws as a candidate for one political party to accept another party’s nominating petition. We conclude that AS 15.25.110 does…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Sea Lion Corp. v. Air Logistics of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Wilson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  4. City of Anchorage v. ScaveniusAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. ApokedakAlaska Supreme Court · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Benner v. WichmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. O'CALLAGHAN v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Arnett v. BaskousAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Wright v. AndingAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Romann v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API