Fidelity Management & Research Co. v. Actuate Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF RULE 30(b)(6) WITNESS FOR THE CONTINUATION OF HIS DEPOSITION AND FOR SANCTIONS FOR IMPROPER INSTRUCTIONS NOT TO ANSWER (#72)
COLLINGS, United States Magistrate Judge.
The issue raised by the motion is how the Court can best resolve a dispute as to how plaintiffs may obtain factual information in a deposition taken pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P.,1 in an manner which does not impinge on the work-product of defendant’s counsel in the process. In the instant case, during the 30(b)(6) deposition plaintiffs’ counsel sought to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Athridge v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Delco Wire & Cable, Inc. v. WeinbergerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
- Laxalt v. McClatchyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1987
- Powell v. United States Dept. of JusticeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1984
- Nesse v. PittmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Abarca v. Werner Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2024
- Angela Branum v. City of Phoenix, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2026
- Atwood v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2022
- Blackmore v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2022
- Cook v. Lynn & William, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.