Legal Opinion
People v. King
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 12, 1952No. Civ. A. 175244PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGlen, J.
Defendant was charged with violating section 33.1541.1 of the San Diego Municipal Code prohibiting any female employee in any on-sale liquor establishment licensed under the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act from drinking, dancing or mingling with any patron of such establishment.
It was specifically charged in the complaint that defendant, a female employee, “did unlawfully mingle with a patron of the Barbett Cafe.”
In sustaining the demurrer the trial court in effect ruled that the ordinance was unconstitutional as being too vague, indefinite and uncertain.
In determining the question of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- State v. ChaplinskySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
- People v. PallaresAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1952
- People v. PallaresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- People v. McCaughanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- In Re CreglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- People v. GrubbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- City of Miami v. KayfetzSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Rushing v. PowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.