People v. Grubb
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.
A jury found that defendant, in violation of Penal Code section 12020, possessed a weapon of a kind commonly known as a billy; the court entered a judgment of conviction. Section 12020 provides, in part, as follows: “Any person in this State who manufactures or causes to be manufactured, imports into the State, keeps for sale, or offers or exposes for sale, or who gives, lends, or possesses any instrument or weapon of the kind commonly known as a blackjack, slungshot, billy, sandclub, sandbag, sawed-off shotgun, or metal knuckles ... is guilty of a felony. ...”
We point out our reasons for…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by126 opinions
- Mozzetti v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. RollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. SeatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. RollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. NavarroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.