Legal Opinion
People v. Pallares
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 30, 1952PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
112 Cal.App.2d Supp. 895 (1952)
THE PEOPLE, Appellant,
v.
DONATO PALLARES, Respondent.
California Court of Appeals.
June 30, 1952.
E. Clarke Savory, District Attorney (Fresno), and Marvin E. Helon, Deputy District Attorney, for Appellant.
Harry Sarkisian for Respondent.
CONLEY, J.
The district attorney of the county of Fresno filed an appeal from an order of the Municipal Court of the Fresno Judicial District sustaining defendant's demurrer to a complaint charging a misdemeanor, to wit: Violation of section 647a(1) of the Penal Code. The order sustaining the demurrer was duly entered on the docket.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- County of Los Angeles v. FrisbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- State v. ChaplinskySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
- People v. PallaresAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1952
- Prior v. WhiteSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
- People v. TrieberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. Jose Alfredo Pallares-GalanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Nino v. Gladys R.California Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. BerryArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Arnold Sanchez Fernandez v. John H. KlingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.