Legal Opinion
Ruckus Wireless, Inc. v. Innovative Wireless Solutions, LLC
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 31, 2016No. 2015-1425, 2015-1438PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dissenting opinion filed by Chief District Judge STARK.
REYNA, Circuit Judge.
Innovative Wireless Solutions (“IWS”) appeals the final judgment of non-infringement of the district court in the Western District of Texas. IWS challenges the district court’s conclusion that the asserted patent claims are limited to wired rather than wireless communications. Because we find no error in the district court’s construction, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
IWS owns U.S. Patent Nos. 5,912,895; 6,327,264; and 6,587,473 (“Terry patents”). The patents are a line of continuations beginning with the ’895 patenf. All share…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Teleflex, Inc. v. Ficosa North America Corp., Fico Cables, S.A., and Ficosa North America S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Teva Pharm. United States, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
- The Gentry Gallery, Inc. v. The Berkline Corporation, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- McRo, Inc. v. Bandai Namco Games AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Cisco Systems, Inc. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Nichia Corporation v. Everlight Americas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Toshiba Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2016
- One World Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.