Converse, Inc. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion concurring-in-part, dissenting-in-part filed by Circuit Judge O'Malley.
Dyk, Circuit Judge.
*1113Converse, Inc., appeals from a final determination of the International Trade Commission ("ITC") that held invalid Converse's trademark in the midsole design of its Chuck Taylor All Star shoes, U.S. Trademark Registration No. 4,398,753 ("the '753 trademark"). Because it found the registered mark invalid and that Converse could not establish the existence of common-law trademark rights, the ITC determined there was no violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1337…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Schaffer Ex Rel. Schaffer v. WeastSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Uncommon, LLC v. Spigen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- RXD Media, LLC v. IP Application Development LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- TLS Mgmt. and Mktg. Ser. LLC v. Rodriguez-ToledoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- Meenaxi Enterprise, Inc. v. the Coca-Cola CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
- Techtronic Industries Co. Ltd. v. ItcCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.